Having wrapped up my Easter Island research I feel there are
a couple of things I should mention concerning the blog. My blog has largely
focussed on alternative explanations to the mysteries of Easter Island as
opposed to the conventional story, largely because I personally find it more
believable (and interesting). I hope I have remained as objective as possible in presenting the research I've done and I hope you readers also kept an open mind when reading this blog and do so should you go on to do further research. It’s important to note that we do not
fully know the story of Easter and continued research is almost always
necessary with these sorts of things. Even with the alternative story there are
many issues, to list all of them would be beyond the scope of this blog, but I
hope I have shed some light or helped promote a new perspective on the long
standing question of what exactly happened on the island. For more information
on the conventional side of the story, as always, I recommend Diamond 2005,
which regardless of which argument is correct provides a huge amount of
important information on this topic, not just relating to Easter Island.
As mentioned in my previous post, whichever story about
Easter proves true, the tale of the island provides important lessons about not living beyond
our environmental carrying capacity, not exploiting vulnerable environments and
keeping careful about what species we introduce to fragile ecosystems.
No comments:
Post a Comment